Chartered Accountants · Kolkata · Since 2007 +91 98305 33138gaurav@ggoenka.com

Burden of proof in certain cases. –

SECTION 123.

1[(1) Where any goods to which this section applies are seized under this Act in the reasonable belief that they are smuggled goods, the burden of proving that they are not smuggled goods shall be -

(a) in a case where such seizure is made from the possession of any person, -

(i) on the person from whose possession the goods were seized; and

(ii) if any person, other than the person from whose possession the goods were seized, claims to be the owner thereof, also on such other person;

(b) in any other case, on the person, if any, who claims to be the owner of the goods so seized.]

(2) This section shall apply to gold, 2[and manufactures thereof], watches, and any other class of goods which the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette specify.

1. Substituted by Act 36 of 1973, section 4, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 01.09.1973).

2. Substituted by Act 40 of 1989, section 2, for “ , diamonds, manufactures of gold or diamonds” (w.e.f. 26.10.1989).

Reference copy from the firm’s resource library, saved on 26 October 2026. Laws, rates and notifications change — for the current position on your matter, please talk to us. Back to the Knowledge Bank.